By
Dr. Ron Shane
Assisted
by Lauren Kupis, Derek Chen, Thanh D Tran, and Alva Liang
Abstract
Humans
have existed for approximately 70,000 years;1 and this particular
species is genetically 97 percent identical to the chimpanzee and bonobo.2
It primarily resided in its early history in social units similar to other
highly evolved hominoid species. 3 The homo sapiens’ conceptual
prowess and abstruse ratiocination was limited for at least 40,000 years of
this species’ existence.4 Epistemology and theosophy was not an
aspect of the homo sapiens’ conscious existence. Questions of a reflective
nature, regarding human physical existence, most likely was induced from
innovative epigenetic neurological changes.5
Neurophysiological
epigenetic remodeling as a function of dietary changes, residing in larger
social units, and modifications in atmospheric chemical densities most likely
affected gene expression which then translated into cortical super circuit
alterations.6,7 Darwin’s theoretical paradigm regarding evolution is
a prima fascia overview of how the variability of gene expression is manifested
into species differentiation.8 However, molecular biologists can now
empirically define how social factors or other environmental variables can
dramatically affect behavioral as well as morphological changes in the human
organism which does not represent alterations in the configurations of the 3
billion nucleotides. 8,9 Homo sapiens have not experienced any
ostensible changes in its 23,000 encoding genes in the preceding 35,000 years;
and it is not known whether there have been alterations in the modulatory
non-coding genes.
Cultural
anthropologists have no paradigm to explicate why this hominoid species with
several billion neurons beyond the chimpanzee’s limited cortex was able to modify
its cultural milieu. For 40,000, years this hominoid species’ outward existence
was not qualitatively distinctive from other genetically related hominoid
organisms. Homo sapiens possessed only rudimentary language skills, very simple
weapons, and other extraneous accouterments during most of its earthly
existence. This organism demonstrated very simplistic ontological propensities.
This puerile tool maker’s social existence was not very different from the
chimpanzees’.
Evolutionary
biologists, and anthropologists have not constructed a paradigm as to why
phenotypical remodeling in terms of the structural dynamics and overall
neurophysiological machinations were changed to where the cognitive acumen, and
other abstract proclivities of this organism were dramatically enhanced. In a
span of 20,000 years, this organism went from utilizing simple concepts,
primitive tool making, and having no cosmological apprehension to a social
evolution or epigenetic remodeling of cortical super circuit physiology to
where there was a formidable restructuring of the homo sapiens’ cultural
existence. Thus, in 30,000 years, the homo sapiens went from observing star light,
and most likely not having any degree of reflective response to mathematically
calculating the existence of magnanimous black holes.
There
are a multitude of relevant inquiries and theories related to this hominoid’s enhanced
proclivities for conceptual reflection. Currently, astrophysicists are
mathematically attempting to comprehend the behavioral dynamics of the cosmos;
and are not inclined to have a sentient apprehension of its experiential
effulgence.10 Conversely, atavistic humans most likely prior to formulizing
anthropomorphic constructs to explicate this species’ relationship to the
celestial sphere were more inclined to experience a mystical coalescence with
the cryptic energies of the cosmic realm.
There
seems to be an intriguing inverse correlation between the body’s deeper
sentient revelry with the celestial realm, and the abstruse elaborate
conceptual paradigms regarding how the homo sapiens abstractly relates to the
cosmic realm. Concepts like intelligence and consciousness have recently
emerged as methodologies for ratiocination in terms of how this species’
abstractly relates to its enigmatic environmental milieu.11 In the
preceding century, scientific mathematical conceptions have come to supplant or
replace anthropomorphic folklore regarding or explicating the celestial sphere.
Most indigenous cultures have consecrated some kind of enigmatic mythic
structure or elaborate theosophy pertaining to the etiology of the celestial realm.
These
seemingly divergent theosophies revealed a similar neurological rendition or
modification germane to this species’ particular epigenetic or phenotypical
remodeling. Scientific instrumentation, and mathematical protocols represent
changes in cortical super circuit axonal connectivity manifesting in less anthropomorphic
ideologies referring to the ubiquitous nature of the cosmos. In philosophical
terms, teleology was replaced by ontological paradigms12 that are
now likewise superseded by mathematical models which are not sentiently
inspired or tempered by the infirmities of egocentric anthropomorphism.
300
years ago, scholarly humans still stated that the earth was the center of the
universe, and the sun revolved around this planet.13 There was an
omnipotent progenitor who consecrated the visible universe; and that humans were
thoroughly emblematic of this imperial celestial emperor. Astrophysicists
within the preceding 100 years have empirically asserted that there are
billions of galaxies with trillions of stars and planetary spheres. The earth
is an insignificant dot in an infinite colossal sea of light and dark matter. The
size of the universe is exponentially expanding as the galaxies are rapidly moving
in the endless ocean of dark energy and matter.14,15
The
earth is rotating and orbiting around the sun, and the entire solar system is
moving in a milky way galaxy which likewise is being propelled through the dark
energy of space by gravitational dynamics. The enigmatic network of gravity appears
to be impacting the conglomeration of all traditional matter.16 Currently,
the nature of gravity is still shrouded by an obscure mystique, and the
etiology or its affect on objects in terms of movement is not yet comprehended.
The force of gravity with respect to its machinations or impact on matter is
still as mysterious and not understood; and scientists do not comprehend it
beyond Newton’s original theories.
Humans
have for at least 30,000 years attempted in anthropomorphic terms to understand
the casual manifestations of the universe or its creation.17 Recently,
the highly conceptual hominoid has observed with reflective acumen the genesis
of all biological organisms; and with this limited analysis have paralleled it to
the matriculations of the universe itself. In the 20th century,
physicists have postulated the big bang theory to replace earlier theological
paradigms contingent or based on mythic theosophical conceptions. Recently,
astrophysicists have conceived that space is comprised of both dark energy and
matter; and it is possible that gigantic black holes most likely existed prior
to the so-called singularity of the big bang theory.18
The
classical big bang theory is predicated upon the hypothesis that all the
universe’s energy and matter was comprised in an area smaller than a child’s
fist.19 If space existed, it did not contain any matter or energy.
Theorists of this paltry paradigm were certainly not aware of either dark
energy or matter which was not widely accepted by physicists at the time of the
big bang theory’s postulation. There was no discussion if space was infinite or
finite, nor was there any regard for an anthropomorphic progenitor or
teleological analysis in the formulation of the big bang theory. In the
author’s view, the big bang paradigm like other anthropomorphic constructions or
teleological theories are fraught with absurd suppositions; and appears to be
as fallacious as other creation myths.18
There
is reasonable likelihood that dark energy and matter existed prior and during
the expansion of traditional energy and matter. Recently, astrophysicists have
discovered colossal black holes in the universe’s seemingly evolution. 20,21,22
It is the author’s contention that black holes, dark energy and matter existed
at the time of what has been deemed the big bang theory. Currently, there are not
any sufficient models yet explicating dark energy and matter’s relationship to
the universe’s traditional matter and energy machinations. All the energy
amplified by the universe’s conglomeration of stars pales in comparison to dark
energy.
Black
holes are consuming all the light based energies at an exponential pace; and there
is not any reliable hypothesis as to what is being done with this matter and
energy. There is some likelihood that the universe’s magnanimous black holes
are actually super sophisticated engines of recycling energy as well as the
manifestations of matter; and this makes more sense than having some kind of
dramatic fallacious single event for engendering the visible universe. This
analysis conceptually has more veracity than does the big bang theory. 23,24
Furthermore, space is no longer a vacuum, but rather a sea of strange subatomic
particles driving enigmatic matter where constructs like time and space have no
existence. Thus, the universe must be conceived as some unified network not
discrete units subject to temporal and spatial analysis. Gravity itself should
actually be viewed as a magnanimous network affecting the fluid dynamics of all
traditional matter.
The
big bang theory was not predicated on the analysis of subatomic particles that
comprise what is known as the sea of space of the universe. Human physical
science is based on photon driven energy as well as large molecular chemistry;
and not the cryptic dark matter or energy which has been stated recently to be
qualitatively distinctive from the recent science of even quantum mechanics or
the subatomic machinations of traditional energy. Any future modeling regarding
the etiology of the universe must be predicated on the synergy and the
antipodal relationship of the gravitational gestalt of black holes, and their
possible coalescence with dark energy and matter which appears now to have a
stronger force on traditional light based matter than that of gravity. All
macromolecular structures are in actuality governed by the fluid dynamics of
its subatomic particles.
It
appears that the motion of objects with less density or the machinations of its
subatomic matter is compelled in its trajectory by the force or network waves
of an entity with enhanced energy dynamics or mass. There is some likelihood
involving waves of communication or small subatomic particle fluid dynamics
amongst the universe’s black holes. 25 Gravity then must be
envisioned as a system or matrix of waves interconnecting and governing the
motion of all objects with some kind of traditional molecular mass. It is
evident that the relationship between gravity, dark matter as well as energy is
not understood, and is still shrouded in an ineffable mystique.
The
human central nervous system can only empirically pursue a particular segment
of physical reality; and time and space analysis is an arbitrary interpretation
of the universe’s infinite complexity of unrelenting subatomic motions. The concept
of the finite or infinity as well as death and rebirth may only be constructs unique
to the cortical super circuitry of certain axonal complexes of the earthly homo
sapiens. It is difficult to assess whether the nucleotide sequences which
eventually lead to the translation of the vast array of amino acid structures
of the human physiology is a template for other enigmatic molecular organisms. Thus,
our empirical science could be flawed, and only relevant to the cortical machinations
of this unique species. Many philosophers have stated that our enigmatic
inquiries could only be then construed to be a fallacious dream.
It
is necessary to regard the big bang theory as an erroneous, and futile attempt
to homeostatically regulate the over-firing of particular cortical super
circuits or the fictitious thrall related to creational myths consecrated in
both endogenous and more contemporary societies. Future physicists need to
produce complex paradigms explicating the relationship between dark energy and
matter and black holes. If there is any phenomena like the big bang theory or
entropy and regenesis of light related energy matter, it would then be
engendered by black holes in an orchestrated manner throughout the universe’s
dark energy subatomic fluid sphere. Thus, puerile analysis of black holes with
respect to the recycling of light based energy may in a metaphorical manner be
representative of earthly volcanoes. This paradigm is novel, and does not yet
have any mathematical veracity. Currently, there are not any theoretical papers
discerning the relationship between dark energy and black holes nor how non-traditional
subatomic particles regulate them. In the preceding 30,000 years when the human
cortex throughout its epigenetic alterations commenced neurologically more
complex conceptualization or philosophical reflection regarding this organism’s
relationship to the celestial sphere has only yielded very limited
substantiated empirical veracity. Many neurobiologists have speculated about
the problematic contentiousness between certain cortical super circuits which
have epigenetically evolved compared to the genetic architecture or its axonal connectivity
of the earlier homo sapien’s neo-cortex.
The
term pertaining to human consciousness according to neuroscientists has not yet
been substantiated in terms of specific neurological machinations; and could be
then a distinctive meta-phenomena from the fluid dynamics of the universe’s
known physical gestalt. In the preceding two millenniums, the pejorative siege
between Plato and Aristotle has not been mitigated; and human metaphysical
predilection is still academically a confounding conundrum. This specie’s quest
in Nietzschean terms for the Apollonian may be devastating to the homo sapiens’
innate mystical proclivities. Anthropologists seem to concur that atavistic
humans possessed a propensity to experience the celestial sphere with some kind
of mystical intentionality.
Contemporary
humans as a function of epigenetic neurological remodeling have become
disinclined in 30,000 years to be intoxicated by the body’s ecstatic celestial
revelry; and instead have formulated conceptual systems to venerate teleological
abstractions which are now being replaced by sophisticated scientific
mathematical theories. The big bang paradigm is absurd in a similar manner to
other mythic indigenous conjurings as astrophysicists have still not been able
to discern the universe’s enigmatic machinations. Space and time analysis most
likely is only a facet of the human cortex’s neurophysiology or reflective
intelligence. It may not necessarily be a ubiquitous aspect of other entities
throughout distinctive galaxies.
Physicists
in the future will be liberated from time and space cycles, and will scrutinize
in the unified manner the continuum of the metamorphosis of various kinds of
small atomic particles’ fluid dynamics. Homo sapiens are pondering a multitude
of abstruse questions without any form of resolution. The ocean of dark energy
demonstrates the limitations of time-based analysis. The phenomena of
consciousness like that of dark energy defies Newtonian physics or the
excessive conjurings related to our current empirical analysis. The simple homo
sapiens’ tool maker residing in small social units like similar hominoid
species was not necessarily cognizant of the universe’s furtive physical machinations.
Dark
energy and matter comprises over 95% of the known universe, and exerts a
negative pressure on gravity. It most likely existed prior and during the
hypothetical big bang event. Dark matter is distinctive from dark energy; 26
and it does not emit or radiate any kind of photon related light. It was
estimated by the Planck Mission Team that ordinary matter only constitutes only
five percent of the universe where as dark matter comprises twenty six percent
and dark energy represents sixty eight percent of space27. In
the best case scenario, the big bang theory represents the genesis of less than
four percent of the universe’s matter and energy; and most likely this ordinary
sustenance is recycled in black holes rather than the big bang theory. Dark
energy and matter constitutes 95 percent of the known universe and is in
opposition to gravity’s effects.
This
dark matter is modulated by occult subatomic particles qualitatively
distinctive from those comprising ordinary matter28, 29. Every
galaxy is inchoated with dark matter and energy; and stars only account for a
small percentage of the universe’s matter. Black holes can be viewed as a
conduit between dark matter and electromagnetic radiation. The relationship
between black holes and dark matter is not at all understood. In the author’s
view, dark matter is not privy to any aspect of the big bang paradigm; and most
likely it modulates the gravitational imperative of black holes; and possibly
the genesis of star formation and even entropy itself. In general, the
connection between black holes and dark energy as well as the big bang theory is
a conundrum for modern theoretical physicists.
Homo
sapiens have departed from the ecstatic revelry of blending with the celestial
marvelment where Apollonian cortical processes from cryptic epigenetics are now
enabling this hominoid to speculate about the relationship of colossal furtive
black holes to that of the universe’s prevalent dark energy which comprises the
enigmatic subatomic particles whose fluid dynamics are antithetical to the sway
of gravity. In existential terms, this species which is ninety seven percent
genetically similar to the chimpanzee as a result of epigenetics is culturally
now extremely divergent from other existing hominoids. It appears that homo
sapiens are forsaken in a conceptual reality engendered by astrophysicists
where the abstractions of epistemology have melted into an eerie subatomic dew.
The
big bang theory, though it has more inordinate merit than other indigenous
mythic creation folklore is hypothetically fallacious as a result of innovative
constructs of astrophysicists in the 21st century. Forlorn and
forsaken homo sapiens are now estranged from their salubrious instinctually;
and are now confounded in an abyss of contracting supernovas impaled by the
lurid antics of dark energy. These seemingly biological entities are now divested
of their mystical prodigiousness to experience the rapturous mystique of
celestial apotheosis. This species as a function of epigenetic related neurological
super circuit remodeling are only discerning a sea of ever expanding constructs
generated by their ever-increasing ratiocination. In summary, the big bang
theory needs to be revised; and thoroughly updated as a phenomena regulated by
dark energy’s affects on colossal black holes.
Sources
[1] Balter,
Michael. "Was North Africa The Launch Pad For Human Migrations?" Science Mag. AAAS, 6 Jan. 2011. Web.
[2]
Khakoo, Salim L., Raja Rajalingam,
Benny P. Shum, Kristin Weidenbach, Laurea Flodin, David G. Muir, Flovio
Canavez, Stewart L. Cooper, Nicholas M. Valiante, Lewis L. Lanier, and Peter
Parham. "Rapid Evolution of NK Cell Receptor Systems Demonstrated by
Comparison of Chimpanzees and Humans." ScienceDirect.
Elsevier/Cell Press, 1 June 2000. Web.
[3] Wilson, Michael L., and Richard W.
Wrangham. "Intergroup Relationships in Chimpanzees." JSTOR. Annual Reviews, 4 June 2003. Web.
09 Mar. 2015.
[4] Ramachandran, V. S.
"MIRROR NEURONS and Imitation Learning as the Driving Force behind the
Great Leap Forward in Human Evolution." THE THIRD CULTURE. John Brockman, 2015. Web. 09 Mar. 2015.
[5] Zeng, Jia, Genevieve Konopka, Brendan G.
Hunt, Todd M. Preuss, Dan Geschwind, and Soojin V. Yi. "Divergent
Whole-Genome Methylation Maps of Human and Chimpanzee Brains Reveal Epigenetic
Basis of Human Regulatory Evolution." Science
Direct. Elsevier/Cell Press, 24 July 2012. Web.
[6]
Masterpasqua, Frank. "Review of
General Psychology, Vol 13(3)." APA
PsychNet. APA, Sept. 2009. Web.
[7]
Brendan Purcell, 2011 From Big Bang
to Big Mystery, Page 164
[8]
Ohta, Tomoko. "The Nearly
Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution." Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. Vol. 23. N.p.: Annual
Reviews, n.d. N. pag. JSTOR. Web. 09
Mar. 2015.
[9]
Sabeti, Peter C., S. F. Schaffner,
B. Fry, J. Lohumueller, P. Varilly, O. Shamovsky, A. Palma, T. S. Mikkelsen, D.
Altshuler, and E. S. Lander. "Positive Natural Selection in the Human
Lineage." Science. AAAS, 16 June
2006. Web. 09 Mar. 2015.
[10]
Hawley, John F., and Katherine A.
Holcomb. "Foundations of Modern Cosmology." Foundations of Modern Cosmology:2nd (Second) Edition. 2nd ed. N.p.:
Oxford UP, 2005. N. pag. Web.
[11]
Shaner, David E., and Robert D.
Hutchinson. "Contextual Relief and the Cultural Evolution of Mind." Sage Journals (n.d.): n. pag. Print.
[12]
Slife, Brent D., PhD. "Taking
Practice Seriously: Toward a Relational Ontology." Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology® (n.d.): n.
pag. Print.
[13]
Danielson, Dennis R. "The Great
Copernican Cliché." AAPT.
American Association of Physics Teachers, 11 Apr. 2001. Web. 09 Mar. 2015.
[14]
Guth, Alan H. "Infiationary
Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems." Physics Review D 23.2 (1981): n. pag.
Stanford University. Web.
[15]
Andrei Linde, Stanford, “ Universe,
Life, Consciousness” article
[16]
Wittman, David M., Anthony J. Tyson,
David Kirkman, Ian Dell'Antonio, and Gary Bernstein. "Detection of Weak
Gravitational Lensing Distortions of Distant Galaxies by Cosmic Dark Matter at
Large Scales." Nature (2011):
143-48. Nature. Web.
[17] Carruthers, Peter, and Andrew Chamberlain.
Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity,
Language, and Meta-cognition. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge U, 2000. Print.
[18]
Rhawn, Joseph. "The Infinite
Universe vs the Myth of the Big Bang: Red Shifts, Black Holes, Acceleration,
Life." Journal of Cosmology 6
(2010): 1548-615. Journal of Cosmology.
Web. 09 Mar. 2015.
[19]
Peter Sahver,2011,Cosmic Heritage:
Evolution from the Big Bang to Conscious Life ,page 43
[20]
Richstone, Dennis, Ajhar E. A, R.
Bender, G. Bower, A. Dressler, S. M. Faber, A. V. Filippenko, K. Gebhardt, R.
Green, L. C. Ho, J. Kormendy, T. Lauer, J. Magorrian, and S. Tremaine.
"Supermassive Black Holes and the Evolution of Galaxies." Astrophysics. Cornell University, 23
Oct. 1998. Web. 09 Mar. 2015.
[21] Camille M. Carlisle, “Monster Black Hole in
Early Universe,” Sky and Telescope, February 26, 2015, http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/monster-black-hole-in-early-universe-0226201523/.
[22]
Xue-Bing Wu et al., “An Ultraluminous
Quasar with a Twelve-Billion-Solar-Mass Black Hole at Redshift 6.30,” Nature
518 (February 26, 2015): 512–515, doi:10.1038/nature14241.
[23]
Ji-Feng Liu, Joel N. Bregman, Yu Bai,
Stephen Justham, Paul Crowther. Puzzling accretion onto a black hole in the
ultraluminous X-ray source M 101 ULX-1. Nature, 2013; 503 (7477): 500 DOI:
10.1038/nature12762
[24] Gemini Observatory. "Fast, furious,
refined: Smaller black holes can eat plenty." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily,
27 November 2013.
<www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131127170415.htm>.
[25]
R. P. Deane, Z. Paragi, M. J. Jarvis,
M. Coriat, G. Bernardi, R. P. Fender, S. Frey, I. Heywood, H.-R. Klöckner, K.
Grainge & C. Rumsey A close-pair binary in a distant triple supermassive
black hole system. Nature 511, 57–60 (03 July 2014) doi:10.1038/nature13454
[26] Ostriker, Jeremiah P., and Paul
Steinhardt. "New Light on Dark Matter." Science Magazine 300.5627 (2003): 1909-913. AAAS. Web.
[27]
Francis Matthew, March 22, 2013, First
Planck Results: The universe is still weird and interesting Arstechnica.
[28] Planck Captures Portrait of Young Universe
Revealing Earliest Light, University of Cambridge, March 21, 2013.
[29]
S. Carroll, Cal Tech, 2007, The
Technology Company Guidebook Part 2 pg. 46.
Ron Shane ND PhD OMD MFA
Dr. Shane is a world-leading
authority in body mind consciousness studies. See Bio section for more information about Dr. Shane.
